🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

If not, the reason might be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Dozens of women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment recently following viral posts indicated that changing their profile gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their professional summaries to include what they called "bro-coded" language - adding results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who use online business jargon.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which content appear to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", described extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her audience decrease substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - brief and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers encountered positive outcomes. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where the same posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and distribute content based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."